3220 M Street

Sacramento, CA 95816

Telephone:  (916) 492-6555

Facsimile:    (916) 492-6556

www.theisonlawgroup.com

©2008 The Ison Law Group

 

 

CALIFORNIA

2008 EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE

 

LEGISLATIVE UPDATES

 

Effective January 1, 2008 (unless otherwise noted), various new laws may have an impact on California employers:

AB 1835:  Minimum Wage Increase

Adopted in 2007, AB 1835 raises the state minimum wage from $7.50 to $8.00 per hour effective January 1, 2008.

SB 812:  Pharmacists/Alternative Workweek Schedules

SB 812 creates a new California Labor Code section 1186.5, which clarifies that all California pharmacists are permitted to adopt alternative workweek schedules (AWS) as provided by Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) Wage Order 4.

Pharmacists, depending on the nature of their work, may be regulated by IWC Wage Order 4, relating to professional, technical, clerical, mechanical and similar occupations (including employees in the health care industry), or by IWC Wage Order 7, which covers employees in the mercantile industry.  Because the AWS rules differ under IWC Wage Orders 4 and 7, employers in the mercantile industry have been confused as to what type of AWS is permitted.

The new Labor Code section 1186.5 expressly permits pharmacists employed in the mercantile industry under IWC Wage Order 7 to adopt the same alternative workweek schedules allowed by IWC Wage Order 4, including alternative workweeks that can be adopted by employees working in the health care industry.

AB 392:  Military Spouse Leave

AB 392 requires certain employers to allow an employee who is the spouse of a member of the Armed Forces, National Guard, or Reserves to take up to 10 days of unpaid leave while the member of the Armed Forces, National Guard, or Reserves is home on leave.

AB 392 enacts a new statute:  California Military and Veterans Code section 395.10.  The statute applies to employers with 25 or more employees, and requires the employer to provide leave to “qualified employees.”  To be eligible for leave under AB 392, an employee must work an average of 20 or more hours per week and must be married to a member of the Armed Forces, National Guard or Reserves deployed during a period of military conflict to an area designated as a combat theater or zone.

Qualified employees are eligible to take time off during “qualified leave periods,” defined as periods during which the soldier-spouses are on leave from deployment.

An employer may not retaliate against any employee for requesting or taking the leave provided by AB 392.

SB 929:  Computer Professionals

SB 929 amends California Labor Code section 515.5, which creates an overtime exemption for certain highly skilled computer professionals who are primarily engaged in intellectual or creative work that requires the exercise of discretion and independent judgment.  Job titles that may, in certain circumstances, fall into this overtime exemption include computer programmers, systems analysts, applications programmers and software engineers.

To qualify for the computer professional overtime exemption, the employee must receive a specified minimum hourly wage (which may be adjusted each year).

Effective January 1, 2008, SB 929 reduces the minimum hourly wage for application of the computer professional exemption from $49.77 to $36.00 per hour.  The lower hourly wage threshold is intended to help the computer programming industry in California remain competitive nationally and globally.

SB 929: Prevailing Wages

SB 929 also amends California Labor Code section 1773.9, which requires contractors and subcontractors performing work on certain public works to pay to their workers the “prevailing” rate of per diem wages.  The prevailing rate includes both hourly wages and employee benefits, and is determined by the Director of Industrial Relations (DIR) with reference to collective bargaining agreements (CBA), wage rates for federal public works, and data from labor and employer groups.  If the DIR determines that the general prevailing rate of per diem wages is the rate established by a CBA, and that the CBA contains pre-determined changes during its term that will affect the prevailing rate, those changes must be incorporated by the DIR into the prevailing wage determination.

SB 929 authorizes contractors and subcontractors, whenever the DIR prevailing wage determination contains a pre-determined change but does not specify how the change will be allocated between hourly wages and employer payments for benefits, to allocate payments equal to that change to either hourly wages or benefits for a specified time period, as provided. SB 929 also provides that, if the allocation of a pre-determined change is subsequently altered by the CBA that formed the basis of the prevailing wage determination, a contractor or subcontractor may allocate payments of not less than the amount of the definite and pre-determined change in accordance with either the originally published allocation or the allocation as altered in the CBA.

These changes are designed to protect employers from frivolous lawsuits that arose from inadvertently failure to comply with certain technical provisions of the former Labor Code section 1773.9.

SB 14:  National Guard Participation in Cal-PERS

SB 14 permits officers, warrant officers, and enlisted personnel of the California National Guard to make a written election to become members of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (Cal-PERS).

AB 338:  Workers Compensation/Temporary Disability Benefits

AB 338 amends California Labor Code section 4656, which sets limits on temporary disability benefits under California’s workers compensation laws.

Currently, Labor Code section 4656 caps an injured worker’s eligibility for temporary disability benefits at 104 weeks.  As interpreted by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), Labor Code section 4656 generally prohibits aggregate disability payments for a single injury occurring on or after April 19, 2004, from extending for more than 104 compensable weeks within a period of 2 years from the first date of temporary disability payments.

Effective January 1, 2008, AB 338 amends Labor Code section 4656 to provide that an injured worker is eligible to receive 104 compensable weeks of aggregate disability payments within a period of 5 years from the date of the injury.

By allowing 104 weeks of aggregate benefits within five years of the date of injury, AB 338 gives injured workers adequate time to obtain needed treatment, including surgery, and return to work after recovery.  This approach also maintains the 104-week cap that has been important in speeding the claims process and improving return-to-work rates for injured workers.

AB 1298:  Privacy Laws

Effective January 1, 2008, AB 1298 amends California’s privacy laws and provides additional protections for California employees. 

California’s data breach notification law, California Civil Code section 1798.82(e), requires individual notice to the affected person any time a business allows unauthorized access to an individual’s name in combination with such personal information as social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, or credit card numbers.   AB 1298 adds “medical information” and “health insurance information” to this list, and will require individual notice any time an employer has reason to believe that such personal information has been accessed by an unauthorized person.

“Medical Information” is defined as “any information regarding an individual’s medical history, mental or physical condition, or medical treatment or diagnosis by a health care professional.”

“Health Insurance Information” is defined as “an individual’s health insurance policy number or subscriber information number, any unique identifier used by a health insurer to identify the individual, or any information in an individual’s application and claims history, including any appeals records.”

These provisions may affect any employer or other entity with computerized employee benefits or other health data.

AB 1298 also expands California’s Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), California Civil Code Section 56.06, to provide that any business maintaining medical information for use by individuals or health care providers is subject to the general requirements imposed on “providers of health care” by the CMIA.   This amendment subjects employers to the civil and criminal penalties prescribed by the CMIA for improper uses and disclosures of medical information.

AB 632:  Health Care “Whistleblowers”

AB 632 amends the California Health and Safety Code by expanding specific “whistleblower” provisions to cover physicians and surgeons who complain about unsafe patient care.

Prior to AB 632, a physician and surgeon who complained about unsafe patient care was not expressly protected.  AB 632 now clarifies that health facilities are prohibited from discriminating or retaliating against any patient, employee, member of the facility’s medical staff or any other health care worker because that person: (1) presented a grievance, complaint or report to accrediting entity or any other governmental agency; or (2) initiated or cooperated in an investigation or proceeding related to the quality of care, services or conditions at the facility.

AB 632 also provides that damages for discrimination/retaliation against such “whistleblowers” may include, but are not limited to, reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and benefits, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and other legal costs.

SB 1613: Cell Phone Restrictions

Adopted in 2006 but effective July 1, 2008, SB 1613 prohibits the use of hand-held cellular phones while operating vehicles, unless the cellular phone is designed and configured for hands-free listening and talking operation, and is used in that manner while driving.

SB 1613 provides that those caught talking on a hand-held cellular phone while driving will be fined up to $50 per violation.  The new law does create exceptions for individuals using a hand-held cellular phone to contact law enforcement or other public safety agencies for emergency purposes, and for emergency services professionals during the operation of authorized emergency vehicles.

AB 2695:  Expanded Workplace Violence Protections

Adopted in 2006 but effective January 1, 2008, AB 2695 extends the scope of an employer’s right to seek workplace violence restraining orders on behalf of employees under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.8.  AB 2695 now authorizes employers to seek restraining orders that protect multiple worksites and orders that protect multiple employees.  AB 2695 also authorizes the employer to seek a restraining order even if the employee who is directly threatened does not want to pursue a restraining order, if the employer reasonably believes there is a credible threat of violence against others in the workplace.

AB 2440: Child Support

Adopted in 2006 but effective January 1, 2008, AB 2440 creates stiff penalties of up to three times the amount of the assistance provided, subject to a maximum of the entire support obligation, for employers who assist employees or contractors in avoiding child support obligations.  AB 2440 applies where an employer knew or should have known that the individual has a child support obligation and fails to report the individual’s hire date, employment, and/or wages to the California Employment Development Department.


In addition to changes in statutory law, state and federal agencies have made important changes:

Social Security No-Match Letters

Effective September 14, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published new regulations setting tough standards for businesses that receive “no match” letters from either the DHS or the Social Security Administration (SSA).  The new regulations impose penalties of up to $10,000 per violation. 

The DHS sends out a “no match” letter to an employer when the immigration-status or employment documentation presented by an employee is inconsistent with DHS records.  The SSA sends out a "no match" letter when the combination of name and social security number submitted for an employee fails to match.  The new DHS rules clarify that employers may be held liable if they fail to take “reasonable steps” within 90 days of receiving a no-match letter.

The new regulations have been suspended via a preliminary injunction granted as of October 15, 2007.

New Employment Eligibility Verification (I-9) Form Required

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a new Form I-9 that employers must use to verify employment eligibility of all new hires or re-verifications. Employers not using the new Form I-9 by December 26, 2007, are subject to penalties. The form must be used for new employees and re-verifications; current employees do not need to complete new forms, unless the employee’s status needs to be re-verified on other grounds.  The new Form I-9 is available for download at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf.

FEHC Anti-Sexual Harassment Training Regulations

Effective August 17, 2007, the Fair Employment and Housing Commission (FEHC) has adopted its final regulations implementing AB 1825. 

AB 1825 applies to all companies that regularly employ fifty (50) or more employees or “receive the services” of 50 or more persons. Any employer utilizing independent contractors or temporary workers must include these persons in making the determination whether the employer is obligated to provide AB 1825 training.   There is no requirement that the fifty (50) employees or contractors work at the same location, or that all work or reside in California.  Out-of-state employees must be included in determining the application of AB 1825, but the employer is not obligated to provide training to out-of-state employees. 

AB 1825 mandates that employers complete their first round of supervisory training on or before January 1, 2006.  Thereafter, employers must provide two (2) hours of sexual harassment prevention training to each supervisory employee every two years.  New supervisory employees must be trained within six (6) months of accepting a supervisory position, and every two (2) years thereafter.  However, a newly hired supervisor can “carry over” training from a previous employer and need only receive and acknowledge a copy of the new employer’s anti-harassment policy within six (6) months of arriving at the new job.

The final AB 1825 regulations allow employers to track compliance individually or by “training year.” Under the “training year” method, an employer may designate a “training year” in which it trains all supervisory employees and thereafter retrains them by the end of the next training year (e.g., all supervisors trained in training year 2005 are trained again in 2007).  Employers must keep documentation of all sexual harassment prevention training, including the name of the supervisory employee trained, the date of training, the type of training, and the name of the qualified trainer.  The documentation must be kept as a business record for a minimum of two (2) years.  Remedies for failure to comply with this record-keeping requirement may include an administrative order from the FEHC finding that the employer is out of compliance, and demanding compliance within sixty (60) days.